Vikings analysis

What Happens When Vikings QBs Go Past the First Read

November 13, 2026  · #vikings#nfl-analytics

Part of an ongoing analysis of the Vikings offense (project hub).

Data through week 9 of 2026.

Bottom line.

  1. When Kyler Murray or J.J. McCarthy throws to his first read, he plays at a normal level.
  2. When the play has to go past the first read, it collapses, and against the blitz it collapses worst.
  3. Cousins, Darnold and Wentz handled the same situations fine.

The problem shows up when a QB who’s still learning the offense has to read past his first option.

Kurt Warner’s film breakdown of the Detroit game made two claims. The first was that the offense leans on “pure progression” reads, which make the QB late. The second was that there’s no “pressure plan,” meaning no quick answer when the defense sends more rushers than the Vikings can block.

Film shows you plays. I wanted to know how often it happens, so I checked both claims against every NFL dropback since 2022.

+0.24 → +0.27
Murray first-read throws, ARI → MIN
−0.11 → −0.67
Murray later-read throws, ARI → MIN
−0.33
Vikings later reads vs blitz, vs league

1. Murray’s drop is past the first read

Kyler Murray, shotgun dropbacks: Arizona vs Minnesota

Opponent- and situation-adjusted EPA per dropback, by how the play ended

Arizona 2022–25 Minnesota 2026
First read49% → 33% of dropbacks
Later read10% → 12% of dropbacks
Checkdown16% → 16% of dropbacks
No throw (sack/scramble)7% → 11% of dropbacks
−1.50−1.00−0.500.00+0.50

Later-read and checkdown gap vs Arizona: −0.36 (95% CI −0.79 to +0.07). Directional: the interval includes zero.

Data table
RowArizona 2022–25Minnesota 2026
First read +0.24+0.27
Later read −0.11−0.67
Checkdown +0.02−0.18
No throw (sack/scramble) −0.82−1.39

The first-read number didn’t move. The drop is past it, and in plays that end with no throw at all. Murray also reaches the first read less often here. Only 36% of his dropbacks end in a first-read throw, 2nd percentile of 165 QB-seasons since 2023.

2. The blitz started costing the Vikings more in 2025

What the blitz costs each offense

Adj. EPA per dropback against 5+ rushers minus against 3–4 · below 0 = the blitz hurts · * through week 9

Vikings Other 31 teams League median
−0.4 −0.2 0.0 +0.2 ARI 2022: +0.02 ATL 2022: +0.03 BAL 2022: +0.02 BUF 2022: −0.17 CAR 2022: −0.15 CHI 2022: −0.11 CIN 2022: −0.10 CLE 2022: −0.06 DAL 2022: +0.04 DEN 2022: −0.01 DET 2022: +0.14 GB 2022: +0.02 HOU 2022: −0.00 IND 2022: −0.30 JAX 2022: +0.13 KC 2022: +0.07 LA 2022: +0.11 LAC 2022: +0.04 LV 2022: −0.28 MIA 2022: −0.16 NE 2022: −0.23 NO 2022: −0.04 NYG 2022: +0.24 NYJ 2022: +0.19 PHI 2022: −0.06 PIT 2022: +0.23 SEA 2022: −0.03 SF 2022: +0.08 TB 2022: −0.39 TEN 2022: −0.07 WAS 2022: −0.15 ARI 2023: +0.12 ATL 2023: +0.26 BAL 2023: −0.00 BUF 2023: −0.29 CAR 2023: −0.15 CHI 2023: −0.08 CIN 2023: +0.23 CLE 2023: −0.15 DAL 2023: +0.12 DEN 2023: −0.15 DET 2023: +0.00 GB 2023: +0.03 HOU 2023: −0.04 IND 2023: −0.04 JAX 2023: −0.09 KC 2023: −0.06 LA 2023: −0.21 LAC 2023: +0.01 LV 2023: −0.09 MIA 2023: +0.11 NE 2023: −0.11 NO 2023: +0.02 NYG 2023: −0.15 NYJ 2023: +0.01 PHI 2023: −0.14 PIT 2023: −0.02 SEA 2023: −0.23 SF 2023: +0.13 TB 2023: +0.07 TEN 2023: −0.19 WAS 2023: −0.02 ARI 2024: −0.27 ATL 2024: −0.01 BAL 2024: −0.15 BUF 2024: +0.03 CAR 2024: −0.06 CHI 2024: +0.04 CIN 2024: −0.08 CLE 2024: −0.13 DAL 2024: +0.13 DEN 2024: −0.10 DET 2024: +0.02 GB 2024: −0.35 HOU 2024: −0.03 IND 2024: −0.36 JAX 2024: −0.07 KC 2024: +0.01 LA 2024: +0.13 LAC 2024: +0.15 LV 2024: +0.06 MIA 2024: −0.22 NE 2024: −0.20 NO 2024: +0.16 NYG 2024: +0.03 NYJ 2024: −0.01 PHI 2024: +0.23 PIT 2024: +0.13 SEA 2024: −0.06 SF 2024: +0.05 TB 2024: +0.06 TEN 2024: +0.20 WAS 2024: −0.01 ARI 2025: +0.01 ATL 2025: +0.04 BAL 2025: +0.32 BUF 2025: +0.08 CAR 2025: −0.17 CHI 2025: +0.21 CIN 2025: +0.22 CLE 2025: +0.01 DAL 2025: −0.08 DEN 2025: +0.12 DET 2025: +0.14 GB 2025: +0.07 HOU 2025: −0.02 IND 2025: +0.01 JAX 2025: +0.13 KC 2025: −0.25 LA 2025: +0.14 LAC 2025: +0.13 LV 2025: +0.16 MIA 2025: −0.01 NE 2025: +0.08 NO 2025: +0.16 NYG 2025: −0.05 NYJ 2025: −0.07 PHI 2025: +0.02 PIT 2025: −0.21 SEA 2025: −0.05 SF 2025: −0.14 TB 2025: −0.02 TEN 2025: −0.45 WAS 2025: −0.04 ARI 2026*: −0.23 ATL 2026*: +0.09 BAL 2026*: +0.10 BUF 2026*: −0.32 CAR 2026*: −0.35 CHI 2026*: +0.02 CIN 2026*: −0.20 CLE 2026*: −0.14 DAL 2026*: −0.20 DEN 2026*: −0.33 DET 2026*: +0.04 GB 2026*: −0.08 HOU 2026*: +0.25 IND 2026*: +0.13 JAX 2026*: −0.27 KC 2026*: +0.02 LA 2026*: −0.06 LAC 2026*: +0.26 LV 2026*: +0.01 MIA 2026*: +0.05 NE 2026*: −0.14 NO 2026*: −0.18 NYG 2026*: −0.23 NYJ 2026*: −0.08 PHI 2026*: −0.04 PIT 2026*: −0.20 SEA 2026*: +0.09 SF 2026*: +0.01 TB 2026*: −0.02 TEN 2026*: +0.23 WAS 2026*: +0.00 MIN 2022: −0.14 (26th pct) 26th pct MIN 2023: +0.03 (74th pct) 74th pct MIN 2024: +0.01 (52nd pct) 52nd pct MIN 2025: −0.25 (7th pct) 7th pct MIN 2026*: −0.29 (10th pct) 10th pct 20222023202420252026*

Percentile labels rank the Vikings among all 32 teams that season (100 = blitz hurts least). A few extreme team-seasons are clipped to the axis.

Data table (Vikings and league median)
SeasonVikingsLeague medianVikings pct
2022−0.14−0.0226
2023+0.03−0.0374
2024+0.01−0.0052
2025−0.25+0.017
2026*−0.29−0.0510

From 2022 to 2024, the blitz cost the Vikings about what it costs everyone. Starting in 2025, they’re near the bottom of the league. Pooled over 2022–26, the Vikings’ blitz penalty is 0.09 larger than the league’s (difference −0.09, 95% CI −0.23 to +0.05). That’s real in 2025 and still noisy for 2026’s half season.

The Vikings’ sack rate rises against the blitz by the same amount as everyone else’s, so the extra cost comes from somewhere besides sacks.

3. The cost sits past the first read

Vikings minus league, adj. EPA per dropback, 2022–26

By how the throw was read · point estimate with 95% interval (games resampled)

Against the blitz (5+ rushers)
First read
Later read / checkdown
No blitz (3–4 rushers)
First read
Later read / checkdown
−0.60−0.40−0.200.00+0.20
Data table
RowEstimate95% CI
Against the blitz (5+ rushers): First read +0.02−0.17 to +0.19
Against the blitz (5+ rushers): Later read / checkdown −0.34−0.59 to −0.07
No blitz (3–4 rushers): First read +0.06−0.05 to +0.16
No blitz (3–4 rushers): Later read / checkdown −0.05−0.17 to +0.05

When the first read is there, the blitz doesn’t matter. When the QB has to work through the progression with extra rushers coming, the Vikings lose a third of a point per dropback relative to the league. That gap only shows up against the blitz.

4. Two QBs carry the blitz penalty

Blitz penalty by Vikings QB-season

Adj. EPA per dropback, 5+ rushers minus 3–4 · QB-seasons with 30+ blitzed dropbacks

Cousins 2022141 blitzed dropbacks
−0.14
Dobbs 202345 blitzed dropbacks
−0.07
Cousins 2023116 blitzed dropbacks
+0.01
Mullens 202346 blitzed dropbacks
+0.06
Darnold 2024134 blitzed dropbacks
+0.02
Wentz 202548 blitzed dropbacks
+0.14
McCarthy 202577 blitzed dropbacks
−0.45
Wentz 2026*30 blitzed dropbacks
−0.02
Murray 2026*56 blitzed dropbacks
−0.45
−0.50−0.40−0.30−0.20−0.100.00+0.10+0.20

Murray's blitz penalty in Arizona (2022–25) was +0.01.

Data table
RowValue
Cousins 2022 (141 blitzed dropbacks)−0.14
Dobbs 2023 (45 blitzed dropbacks)−0.07
Cousins 2023 (116 blitzed dropbacks)+0.01
Mullens 2023 (46 blitzed dropbacks)+0.06
Darnold 2024 (134 blitzed dropbacks)+0.02
Wentz 2025 (48 blitzed dropbacks)+0.14
McCarthy 2025 (77 blitzed dropbacks)−0.45
Wentz 2026* (30 blitzed dropbacks)−0.02
Murray 2026* (56 blitzed dropbacks)−0.45

I expected this to be a Minnesota problem that every QB would show. It isn’t. Cousins, Darnold and Wentz were close to normal. McCarthy and Murray are the two outliers, and they’re the two QBs who were new to the offense and struggling with its progressions.

So what

  • Simplifying alone won’t fix it. First-read throws already work. The cost is in the plays that don’t resolve at the first read. A QB new to the system needs built-in quick answers against extra rushers (hot routes, sight adjustments), or a quicker way to get off a covered first read.
  • This explains why the offense has looked broken with some QBs and fine with others. The same plays cost little with a veteran who processes quickly and a lot with a young or new QB.
  • What to watch: Kirk Cousins is back. If this reading is right, the Vikings’ blitz penalty should return to league-typical with him under center. If it doesn’t, the problem is bigger than QB fit.

What this doesn’t tell us

  • Blitz counts come from FTN’s charters. “More rushers than blockers” isn’t charted, so 5+ rushers is a proxy.
  • Per-QB samples are small: 56 blitzed dropbacks for Murray, 77 for McCarthy.
  • Play-by-play can’t separate a missed hot route from a QB who didn’t see it. This shows where the cost is. It can’t say whose assignment failed.

Method: every NFL dropback 2022–26, with opponent and game-situation effects removed. Intervals resample whole games. Full analysis: Q25, Q19. Data: nflverse and FTN charting (CC-BY-SA 4.0).


← Vikings analysis